Remember Dolly the sheep?  She was the first mammal to be cloned from an adult somatic cell (a cell other than a sperm or egg cell) – that was in 1996.  Well, Dolly is back again in the news, even though she passed away prematurely in 2003.

Last Thursday (May 8, 2014) the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a ruling by the US Patent and Trademark Office’s Appeal Board that cloned animals are ineligible for patent protection under 35 USC § 101.  The Court determined that “Dolly herself is an exact genetic replica of another sheep and does not possess markedly different characteristics from any [farm animals] found in nature.”  The Court went on to say, “Dolly’s genetic identify to her donor parent renders her unpatentable.”  See In re Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), 2013-1407.

The timing of this Federal Circuit decision is uncanny, because it came literally on the eve of a public forum held at the US Patent and Trademark Office on the very topic of the recent Guidance For Determining Subject Matter Eligibility Of Claims Reciting Or Involving Laws of Nature, Natural Phenomena, & Natural Products (the Guidance)I was invited to present at this Forum, where I provided comments before the USPTO on the necessity for the guidance, how the guidance can be improved, and also provided cautions to prevent its misapplication.  I had previously written about the Guidance in an earlier article on this site (see, How to Patent Grapefruit Juice: the New USPTO Guidance for Patent Eligible Subject Matter is Both Sticky and Sour).

Read More

By Anthony D. Sabatelli, PhD
Partner, Dilworth IP